The Weiner Emails: What’s Being Missed

 

 

Remember back during the 2016 campaign, when Leakin’ James Comey assured us that the hundreds of thousands of Clinton emails found on Spanky Weiner’s laptop were meticulously examined at breakneck speed thanks to the “wizardry of technology”? Remember how you, me and everyone else with an IQ above room temperature suspected that maybe he wasn’t being totally forthcoming? 

Well I’ll be darned — we were right.

Paul Sperry of RealClearInvestigations, who honestly should be competing with Sara Carter for a Pulitzer for the recent work he’s done regarding government corruption, recently published compelling evidence indicating that, yes, Comey did expedite the end of the Hillzdawg probe based on political motivations. And yes, he lied about the contents of the Spanky trove being investigated. In reality, they barely scratched the surface of what’d been found.

---

Comey later told Congress that “thanks to the wizardry of our technology,” the FBI was able to eliminate the vast majority of messages as “duplicates” of emails they’d previously seen. Tireless agents, he claimed, then worked “night after night after night” to scrutinize the remaining material.

But virtually none of his account was true, a growing body of evidence reveals.

In fact, a technical glitch prevented FBI technicians from accurately comparing the new emails with the old emails. Only 3,077 of the 694,000 emails were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information. Three FBI officials completed that work in a single 12-hour spurt the day before Comey again cleared Clinton of criminal charges.

But man, it gets worse.

Even the tiny sliver of emails that were actually checked contained extremely sensitive classified information. Some of it may even qualify for Special Access Program (SAP) status. That means it deals with information on our enemies, some of which quite possibly taken from human sources, or HUMINT.  

“Contradicting Comey’s testimony, this included highly sensitive information dealing with Israel and the U.S.-designated terrorist group Hamas,” Sperry reports. “The former secretary of state, however, was never confronted with the sensitive new information and it was never analyzed for damage to national security.”

This could be anything from information derived from Mossad agents undercover inside Hamas to what we know about their future missile plans to how Israel is planning to leverage themselves in upcoming negotiations. It’s all extremely important information that has dire consequences if leaked. Yes, Hillary should be in prison. She should be starting her third year behind bars, actually.

.

To add to this already investigation-worthy monstrosity, Sperry also reveals that no intelligence officials were alerted so as to analyze possible damage to national security:

Even though the unique classified material was improperly stored and transmitted on an unsecured device, the FBI did not refer the matter to U.S. intelligence agencies to determine if national security had been compromised, as required under a federally mandated “damage assessment” directive.

The newly discovered classified material “was never previously sent out to the relevant original classification authorities for security review,” the official, who spoke to RealClearInvestigations on the condition of anonymity, said.

In the good ole days we used to call that dereliction of duty.

According to the report, Comey was lying through his sanctimonious teeth when he testified before Congress that the case had been wrapped. Very important parts of the probe were indeed ongoing. That big white lie pales in comparison, though, to the charge levied by an agent directly involved with the probe. Sperry’s FBI source explicitly accuses the bureau of hiding evidence on behalf of Hillary. 

“One career FBI special agent involved in the case complained to New York colleagues that officials in Washington tried to ‘bury’ the new trove of evidence, which he believed contained the full archive of Clinton’s emails — including long-sought missing messages from her first months at the State Department,” Sperry writes.